Highlights:

  • Los Angeles has the most chargers of any metro area at 36,318.
  • San Francisco is the most EV-friendly metro area based on charger density, with 334 residents per charger.
  • Louisville is the least EV-friendly metro area at 2,904 residents per charger, nearly nine times San Francisco's ratio.
  • Vermont ranks first among states at 450 residents per charger, just ahead of California at 480.
  • U.S. EV charger growth is projected at just 15.5% in 2026, down sharply from 25.7% in 2025.
  • The U.S. is still projected to reach 299,798 chargers in 2026, up from 259,555 in 2025, while the ratio of residents per charger is projected to improve 13.2% from 1,317 to 1,143.

The U.S. is projected to add 40,243 electric vehicle chargers in 2026, bringing the nationwide total to 299,798. Despite this increase, annual charger growth is slowing significantly, and the gap between the most and least EV-friendly places is substantial.

San Francisco is the most EV-friendly city, based on a charger density of 334 residents per EV charger, while Louisville is the least-friendly, having only one charger for every 2,904 residents.

iSeeCars analyzed the number of Level 2 and Level 3/DC Fast Chargers from data published by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Alternative Fuels Data Center to identify trends in U.S. EV charging infrastructure from 2025 to 2026. 

“Charging infrastructure remains a primary concern for mainstream consumers considering an electric vehicle,” said iSeeCars Executive Analyst Karl Brauer. “This latest iSeeCars study confirms why, given the disparity in EV charger access across major metro areas.”

America’s EV charger expansion is losing momentum

The long-term growth chart shows a charging network that expanded rapidly in 2011, and remained above 30% throughout most of the following decade. But by 2025, year-over-year growth had fallen to roughly 25%, less than half the 2021 rate. The projected 15.5% increase for 2026 would continue the decline in annual charger growth.

“America’s EV charging network is still expanding, but the growth curve has changed substantially. A projected 15.5% increase for 2026 still adds tens of thousands of chargers, but it represents a much slower expansion rate compared to the average over the past decade,” said Brauer.

Slower growth still adds more than 40,000 chargers

Despite the slower growth rate, the U.S. charger network continues to expand. Total chargers are projected to increase from 259,555 in 2025 to 299,798 in 2026, an increase of more than 40,000 chargers.

The national ratio of residents to chargers is projected to improve from 1,317 to 1,143, a 13.2% improvement. That means charging infrastructure is still becoming more plentiful relative to the U.S. population, even as the rate of network expansion slows.

U.S. EV Charger Growth: 2025 to 2026 - iSeeCars Study
Year Residents per Charger Total Chargers
2025 1,317 259,555
2026* 1,143 299,798
Year-over-year Improvement 13.2% 15.5%

*2026 Figures are projected using data through September 2026. 
“The more than 40,000 projected EV chargers added in 2026 help address the concerns of consumers who are considering an electric vehicle but worry about charging access,” said Brauer.

Los Angeles leads the nation in total EV chargers

Los Angeles leads among the nation’s 50 largest metro areas with 36,318 chargers, followed by San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, New York, Boston and Denver.

The difference between the largest and smallest networks is substantial. Louisville has just 621 chargers, followed by Greensboro-Winston Salem with 700. Los Angeles has more than 58 times as many chargers as Louisville.

California accounts for four of the top 10 metro areas, with Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and Sacramento all making the list. Combined, the 10 highest-ranked metro areas have 134,800 chargers, or about 45% of the projected national total.

Metro Areas With the Most and Fewest EV Chargers: 2026* - iSeeCars Study
Rank Most Chargers Fewest Chargers
Metro Area Total Chargers Metro Area Total Chargers
1 Los Angeles, CA 36,318 Louisville, KY 621
2 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA 22,430 Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC 700
3 New York, NY 19,036 Milwaukee, WI 852
4 Boston, MA-Manchester, NH 12,017 Birmingham, AL 857
5 Denver, CO 8,300 Oklahoma City, OK 867
6 Seattle-Tacoma, WA 7,820 Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA 935
7 Washington, DC (Hagerstown, MD) 7,667 San Antonio, TX 1,112
8 San Diego, CA 7,582 Indianapolis, IN 1,142
9 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 6,836 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News,VA 1,148
10 Atlanta, GA 6,794 Cincinnati, OH 1,165

*2026 Figures are projected using data through September 2026.
“California’s EV-friendly weather and tech-oriented communities clearly contribute to the state’s EV demand and aggressive charging infrastructure buildout, but high-ranking New York, Boston, and Denver reflect strong EV charging support outside the Golden State,” said Brauer.

San Francisco has over three times the national charger density

Total chargers only tell part of the story. When population is considered, San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose ranks first with just 334 residents per charger, 71% fewer than the national ratio of 1,143. San Diego ranks second at 432 residents per charger, followed by Los Angeles at 500. Denver and Boston are nearly tied at 569 and 571, respectively.

Louisville sits at the opposite end with 2,904 residents per charger, or nearly nine times as many residents competing for each charger as San Francisco. Indianapolis ranks second-lowest followed closely by Milwaukee, Greensboro-Winston Salem and San Antonio.

Several markets combine both a high number of chargers and a low ratio of residents per charger, including San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boston, and Denver. Other markets, including Louisville, Milwaukee, and Greensboro-Winston Salem, fail at both metrics.

Most and Least EV-Friendly Metro Areas: 2026* - iSeeCars Study
Rank Most EV-Friendly Least EV-Friendly
Metro Area Residents per Charger Total Chargers Metro Area Residents per Charger Total Chargers
1 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA 334 22,430 Louisville, KY 2,904 621
2 San Diego, CA 432 7,582 Indianapolis, IN 2,758 1,142
3 Los Angeles, CA 500 36,318 Milwaukee, WI 2,716 852
4 Denver, CO 569 8,300 Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC 2,669 700
5 Boston, MA-Manchester, NH 571 12,017 San Antonio, TX 2,666 1,112
6 Hartford & New Haven, CT 611 4,351 Houston, TX 2,453 3,170
7 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 659 6,836 Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH 2,393 1,615
8 Seattle-Tacoma, WA 716 7,820 Birmingham, AL 2,355 857
9 Portland, OR 885 3,951 Oklahoma City, OK 2,337 867
10 Austin, TX 919 2,840 Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA 2,243 935
National Average 1,143 299,798

*2026 Figures are projected using data through September 2026.
“Total charger count can obscure how accessible a charging network really is. Looking at residents per charger provides a clearer measure of how much infrastructure is available to local EV drivers,” said Brauer.

Minneapolis and Seattle show the greatest improvement in charger access

Minneapolis-St. Paul has the largest projected year-over-year improvement in charger access, with residents per charger falling 22.5% from 2,478 to 1,921.

Seattle ranks second with a 19.7% improvement, while Milwaukee improves 18.4%. Boston, Denver, Sacramento and New York also improve at least 17.9%, well above the 13.2% national average.

But rapid improvement does not necessarily equal strong current access. Milwaukee has the third-largest improvement while remaining the third least EV-friendly metro at 2,716 residents per charger. Oklahoma City similarly improves 17.6% but remains among the 10 least EV-friendly metros.

Las Vegas has the smallest improvement at 5%, yet its 1,054 residents-per-charger remains slightly better than the national average. Birmingham has the opposite situation, with just 6.2% improvement and 2,355 residents per charger.

Most and Least Improved Metro Areas for EV Infrastructure: 2025-2026 - iSeeCars Study
Rank Most Improved Least Improved
Metro Area % Improvement Residents per Charger 2026* Residents per Charger 2025 Metro Area % Improvement Residents per Charger 2026* Residents per Charger 2025
1 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN 22.5% 1,921 2,478 Las Vegas, NV 5.0% 1,054 1,109
2 Seattle-Tacoma, WA 19.7% 716 892 Birmingham, AL 6.2% 2,355 2,512
3 Milwaukee, WI 18.4% 2,716 3,327 Baltimore, MD 6.8% 923 991
4 Boston, MA-Manchester, NH 18.3% 571 699 Washington, DC (Hagerstown, MD) 7.3% 952 1,027
5 Denver, CO 18.1% 569 694 Nashville, TN 7.4% 1,633 1,764
6 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 17.9% 659 803 Kansas City, MO 7.8% 1,034 1,122
7 New York, NY 17.9% 1,145 1,395 Phoenix, AZ 8.7% 1,352 1,481
8 Chicago, IL 17.9% 1,784 2,172 Houston, TX 9.2% 2,453 2,701
9 Oklahoma City, OK 17.6% 2,337 2,835 Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC 9.4% 2,669 2,947
10 Salt Lake City, UT 17.4% 964 1,166 Hartford & New Haven, CT 9.6% 611 676
National Average 13.2% 1,143 1,317

*2026 Figures are projected using data through September 2026.
“A high growth rate can represent a city trying to catch up versus leading in EV charger access. Milwaukee and Oklahoma City are adding charger access faster than the national average, but both still have more than twice as many residents per charger than several of the highest-ranked markets,” said Brauer.

California has three times more EV chargers than second place New York

California dominates the state rankings with 81,932 chargers, more than three times New York's second-place total of 24,519. California alone accounts for more than one-quarter of all projected U.S. chargers.

Florida ranks third at 17,069, followed by Texas at 14,345 and Massachusetts at 13,280. Altogether, the 10 states with the largest charger networks account for 195,111 chargers, about 65% of the national total.

At the other end of the spectrum, Alaska has just 227 chargers, followed by North Dakota with 288, South Dakota with 345, and Wyoming with 349. The bottom 10 states combined account for less than 2% of the national total, and less than the 7,100 in Illinois alone.

U.S. States With the Most and Fewest EV Chargers: 2026* - iSeeCars Study
Rank Most Chargers Fewest Chargers
State Total Chargers State Total Chargers
1 California 81,932 Alaska 227
2 New York 24,519 North Dakota 288
3 Florida 17,069 South Dakota 345
4 Texas 14,345 Wyoming 349
5 Massachusetts 13,280 Montana 502
6 Washington 10,489 West Virginia 600
7 Colorado 9,242 Mississippi 834
8 Georgia 8,860 Nebraska 842
9 New Jersey 8,275 Delaware 843
10 Illinois 7,100 Idaho 854

*2026 Figures are projected using data through September 2026.

Vermont edges California for the best statewide charger access

Vermont ranks as the most EV-friendly state based on charger density, with 450 residents per charger. California follows closely at 480, with Massachusetts third at 539.

Louisiana has the highest residents-per-charger ratio at 4,717, more than four times the national average and more than 10 times Vermont's ratio. Mississippi ranks second, followed by Kentucky and Alaska.

The state rankings reinforce the geographic differences seen at the metro level. Charger access can vary dramatically depending on where an EV is operated, even as the national network continues to expand.

Most and Least EV-Friendly U.S. States: 2026* - iSeeCars Study
Rank Most EV-Friendly Least EV-Friendly
State Residents per Charger Total Chargers State Residents per Charger Total Chargers
1 Vermont 450 1,432 Louisiana 4,717 979
2 California 480 81,932 Mississippi 3,541 834
3 Massachusetts 539 13,280 Kentucky 3,270 1,409
4 Colorado 651 9,242 Alaska 3,254 227
5 Connecticut 677 5,448 West Virginia 2,942 600
6 Washington 763 10,489 North Dakota 2,776 288
7 Maine 793 1,784 South Dakota 2,710 345
8 New York 816 24,519 Indiana 2,623 2,659
9 Oregon 894 4,781 Arkansas 2,572 1,211
10 Maryland 981 6,389 Nebraska 2,398 842
National Average 1,143 299,798

*2026 Figures are projected using data through September 2026.
“The difference between Vermont's 450 residents per charger and Louisiana's 4,717 illustrates how uneven EV infrastructure remains. National growth is meaningful, but local charger availability can have a major impact on how comfortable a buyer is making an EV purchase,” said Brauer .

New Jersey and Washington lead states for EV infrastructure improvement

New Jersey has the largest projected improvement in residents per charger at 22.2%, moving from 1,483 residents per charger in 2025 to 1,154 in 2026. Washington is essentially tied at 22.1%, improving from 979 to 763.

Minnesota ranks third, followed by Illinois, Idaho, Utah, Wisconsin, and Colorado. North Dakota shows no improvement, remaining at 2,776 residents per charger in both years. Wyoming improves just 2.8%.

The combination of current charger access and improvement rate provides useful context. Washington and Colorado already rank among the most EV-friendly states and continue to improve faster than the national average. North Dakota and West Virginia remain among the least EV-friendly states while also posting some of the smallest year-over-year gains.

Most and Least Improved U.S. States for EV Infrastructure: 2025-2026* - iSeeCars Study
Rank Most Improved Least Improved
State % Improvement Residents per Charger 2026* Residents per Charger 2025 State % Improvement Residents per Charger 2026* Residents per Charger 2025
1 New Jersey 22.2% 1,154 1,483 North Dakota 0.0% 2,776 2,776
2 Washington 22.1% 763 979 Wyoming 2.8% 1,689 1,737
3 Minnesota 21.7% 1,943 2,482 West Virginia 3.9% 2,942 3,061
4 Illinois 19.3% 1,792 2,219 Alaska 4.2% 3,254 3,398
5 Idaho 18.3% 2,376 2,908 Nevada 5.6% 1,046 1,108
6 Utah 18.2% 992 1,212 Tennessee 6.5% 2,077 2,222
7 Wisconsin 17.7% 2,320 2,820 Mississippi 6.7% 3,541 3,797
8 Colorado 17.5% 651 789 Alabama 7.6% 2,286 2,474
9 Nebraska 17.0% 2,398 2,887 Maryland 7.9% 981 1,065
10 Massachusetts 16.7% 539 647 Kansas 8.2% 1,792 1,951
National Average 13.2% 1,143 1,317

*2026 Figures are projected using data through September 2026.
“While states like California and New York are clearly ‘all in’ on EV infrastructure, it’s difficult to imagine North Dakota, Wyoming or West Virginia ever making a big push to support electric vehicles,” said Brauer. “The combination of colder temperatures and dominant rural landscape in those states is counter to an electric vehicle’s best use case and charging process.”

“There’s a growing divide between electric vehicle proponents and traditional, internal combustion buyers, and the disparity between the most- and least-friendly EV cities and states seems to reflect it,” said Brauer. “If you’re shopping for your next car, and seriously considering an EV, local charging access and competition should be a primary consideration. This is especially important today, given the slowing buildout of EV infrastructure in recent years.”

 

Methodology

iSeeCars Research analyzed data from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Alternative Fuels Data Center through 2026 as of September 23, 2026. The number of Level 2 EVSE and Level 3/DC Fast EVSE ports was aggregated nationally, by metro area, and by state. For 2026, the number of chargers for the whole year was projected linearly from the available daily data. The number of chargers was also normalized by population counts from the U.S. Census Bureau and expressed as the number of residents per charger. For national data, the latest population data available from 2025 and 2026 was used for the corresponding EV chargers data of each year. For state and metro area data, population data for 2025 and 2024, respectively, the latest data available at each geographic level, was used instead.

About iSeeCars

iSeeCars helps millions of people make smarter car decisions and find the best deals by leveraging data-driven research and unbiased analysis. iSeeCars Research conducts independent studies that provide key insights on vehicles, market trends, and the automotive industry, including Best Cars Rankings and the annual Longest Lasting Cars Study. With the goal of making car shopping easier and more transparent, iSeeCars.com analyzes millions of car listings and offers valuable resources like iVIN Reports, Window Stickers, and Build Sheets. iSeeCars has saved users over $451 million using over 25 billion data points and proprietary algorithms to objectively analyze, score, and rank new and used vehicles.