Summary
- San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose is the most EV-friendly metro area and St. Louis, MO is the least EV-friendly
- Vermont is the most EV-friendly state overall, while Mississippi is the least
- The national average is one EV charger for every 2,280 U.S. residents
- For Level 3 fast chargers, there is one for every 11,602 U.S. residents
Electric vehicle market share has more than doubled in the past 2 years, rising from 2.7 percent in early 2021 to 6.4 percent at the end of 2022. That means tens of thousands more EVs on the road today, with thousands more joining them every month. While many of these electric cars will be charged primarily at their owner’s homes, they will also put increasing demands on the 146,000 electric vehicle charging stations that make up the U.S charging network. Public charging access will be particularly important for new EV owners living in apartments, condominiums, and other multifamily housing units.
iSeeCars analyzed the national EV charging infrastructure to determine which cities and states offer the best and worst electric vehicle charging support for EV owners looking to plug into public chargers. The analysis looks at both Level 2 and Level 3 chargers (also known as DC fast chargers), and also evaluates the Tesla and non-Tesla networks separately, to see where cities and states rank based on how many residents each EV charging station must potentially serve. In this study these numbers reflect how many plugs (or charging ports) are available.
“Many drivers are on the verge of making their first EV purchase,” said Karl Brauer, Executive Analyst at iSeeCars. “Consumers looking to switch from gasoline to electric power should consider their local charging equipment options to understand how many potential electric vehicle owners they may be competing with, both today and in the near future.”
Which Cities offer the Best and Worst Overall Electric Vehicle Charging Support?
“Five of the top 10 EV-friendly cities are located in California, which isn’t really surprising, but who knew Denver was the most EV-friendly city outside California?” said Brauer. “It’s also interesting to see that the 10th ranked most EV-friendly market, Seattle-Tacoma, has nearly 3 times as many residents competing for each EV charger as the top-ranked market, San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose.”On the flipside, Texas has 3 of the top 10 least EV-friendly cities in the nation, though St. Louis ranks the worst, Birmingham, Alabama, is the second worst, and Indianapolis lands at number three.
Top 10 Most and Least EV-Friendly Metro Areas by Total Chargers (including Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most EV-Friendly | Least EV-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers | Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 465 | 14,083 | 1 | St. Louis, MO | 5,787 | 473 |
2 | San Diego, CA | 824 | 3,450 | 2 | Birmingham, AL | 5,691 | 296 |
3 | Los Angeles, CA | 852 | 18,287 | 3 | Indianapolis, IN | 5,422 | 491 |
4 | Denver, CO | 992 | 4,128 | 4 | San Antonio, TX | 5,386 | 464 |
5 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 1,024 | 1,692 | 5 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 5,217 | 635 |
6 | Kansas City, MO | 1,063 | 2,101 | 6 | Louisville, KY | 5,194 | 302 |
7 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 1,111 | 3,481 | 7 | Milwaukee, WI | 5,092 | 378 |
8 | Boston, MA-Manchester, NH | 1,111 | 5,366 | 8 | Houston, TX | 4,454 | 1,448 |
9 | Baltimore, MD | 1,234 | 2,119 | 9 | Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC | 4,153 | 387 |
10 | Seattle-Tacoma, WA | 1,299 | 3,744 | 10 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX | 3,581 | 2,024 |
National Avg | 2,280 | 146,160 |
Top 50 Metro Areas Ranked by Residents per Charger (including Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 465 | 14,083 |
2 | San Diego, CA | 824 | 3,450 |
3 | Los Angeles, CA | 852 | 18,287 |
4 | Denver, CO | 992 | 4,128 |
5 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 1,024 | 1,692 |
6 | Kansas City, MO | 1,063 | 2,101 |
7 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 1,111 | 3,481 |
8 | Boston, MA-Manchester, NH | 1,111 | 5,366 |
9 | Baltimore, MD | 1,234 | 2,119 |
10 | Seattle-Tacoma, WA | 1,299 | 3,744 |
11 | Austin, TX | 1,310 | 1,679 |
12 | Washington, DC (Hagerstown, MD) | 1,337 | 4,610 |
13 | Salt Lake City, UT | 1,493 | 1,969 |
14 | Portland, OR | 1,494 | 2,043 |
15 | Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL | 1,691 | 2,424 |
16 | Hartford & New Haven, CT | 1,848 | 1,253 |
17 | Las Vegas, NV | 1,864 | 1,097 |
18 | Atlanta, GA | 1,949 | 3,248 |
19 | West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL | 2,031 | 967 |
20 | Columbus, OH | 2,083 | 1,086 |
21 | Phoenix, AZ | 2,123 | 2,373 |
National Average | 2,280 | 146,160 | |
22 | Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC | 2,453 | 1,183 |
23 | Orlando-Daytona Beach, FL | 2,552 | 1,586 |
24 | New York, NY | 2,601 | 7,245 |
25 | Jacksonville, FL | 2,664 | 672 |
26 | Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo, MI | 2,965 | 609 |
27 | Nashville, TN | 2,981 | 898 |
28 | Charlotte, NC | 3,000 | 992 |
29 | Chicago, IL | 3,032 | 2,734 |
30 | Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News,VA | 3,033 | 562 |
31 | Pittsburgh, PA | 3,063 | 808 |
32 | Philadelphia, PA | 3,071 | 2,351 |
33 | Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM | 3,097 | 541 |
34 | Oklahoma City, OK | 3,164 | 537 |
35 | Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN | 3,232 | 1,305 |
36 | Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA | 3,351 | 536 |
37 | Detroit, MI | 3,378 | 1,260 |
38 | Tampa-St Petersburg (Sarasota), FL | 3,381 | 1,352 |
39 | Greenville-Spartanburg, SC | 3,429 | 613 |
40 | Cincinnati, OH | 3,465 | 603 |
41 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX | 3,581 | 2,024 |
42 | Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC | 4,153 | 387 |
43 | Houston, TX | 4,454 | 1,448 |
44 | Milwaukee, WI | 5,092 | 378 |
45 | Louisville, KY | 5,194 | 302 |
46 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 5,217 | 635 |
47 | San Antonio, TX | 5,386 | 464 |
48 | Indianapolis, IN | 5,422 | 491 |
49 | Birmingham, AL | 5,691 | 296 |
50 | St. Louis, MO | 5,787 | 473 |
Which States Are the Most and Least EV Friendly?
Is California the most EV-friendly state? No, Vermont is, with only 703 residents per charger. California comes in at number two, with 881 residents per charger. Massachusetts, Colorado and Rhode Island round out the top 5 states.Mississippi is the least EV-friendly state, with 9,275 residents per charger – more than 10 times the residents per charger compared to number one Vermont. The rankings for all 50 states are in the table below.
Top 10 Most and Least EV-Friendly States by Total Chargers (including Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most EV-Friendly | Least EV-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers | Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | Vermont | 703 | 920 | 1 | Mississippi | 9,275 | 317 |
2 | California | 881 | 44,287 | 2 | Louisiana | 9,144 | 502 |
3 | Massachusetts | 1,167 | 5,981 | 3 | Kentucky | 7,349 | 614 |
4 | Colorado | 1,289 | 4,530 | 4 | Alaska | 6,492 | 113 |
5 | Rhode Island | 1,462 | 748 | 5 | Indiana | 6,345 | 1,077 |
6 | Maryland | 1,524 | 4,044 | 6 | Alabama | 5,991 | 847 |
7 | Hawaii | 1,574 | 915 | 7 | Wisconsin | 5,313 | 1,109 |
8 | Maine | 1,602 | 865 | 8 | Idaho | 5,171 | 375 |
9 | Oregon | 1,717 | 2,469 | 9 | Arkansas | 5,018 | 607 |
10 | Washington | 1,730 | 4,500 | 10 | South Carolina | 5,012 | 1,054 |
National Avg | 2,280 | 146,160 |
US States Ranked by Residents per Charger (including Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | Vermont | 703 | 920 |
2 | California | 881 | 44,287 |
3 | Massachusetts | 1,167 | 5,981 |
4 | Colorado | 1,289 | 4,530 |
5 | Rhode Island | 1,462 | 748 |
6 | Maryland | 1,524 | 4,044 |
7 | Hawaii | 1,574 | 915 |
8 | Maine | 1,602 | 865 |
9 | Oregon | 1,717 | 2,469 |
10 | Washington | 1,730 | 4,500 |
11 | Utah | 1,802 | 1,876 |
12 | New York | 1,950 | 10,089 |
13 | Nevada | 1,977 | 1,607 |
14 | Connecticut | 2,123 | 1,708 |
National Avg | 2,280 | 146,160 | |
15 | Virginia | 2,516 | 3,452 |
16 | Georgia | 2,655 | 4,110 |
17 | Missouri | 2,717 | 2,274 |
18 | Arizona | 2,750 | 2,676 |
19 | Kansas | 2,755 | 1,066 |
20 | Wyoming | 2,809 | 207 |
21 | Delaware | 2,821 | 361 |
22 | Florida | 2,911 | 7,641 |
23 | New Hampshire | 2,950 | 473 |
24 | New Jersey | 3,228 | 2,869 |
25 | North Carolina | 3,398 | 3,149 |
26 | Michigan | 3,704 | 2,709 |
27 | Oklahoma | 3,729 | 1,078 |
28 | Minnesota | 3,766 | 1,518 |
29 | Pennsylvania | 3,892 | 3,333 |
30 | Illinois | 3,938 | 3,195 |
31 | New Mexico | 3,995 | 529 |
32 | Ohio | 4,163 | 2,824 |
33 | Tennessee | 4,172 | 1,690 |
34 | Nebraska | 4,354 | 452 |
35 | Montana | 4,386 | 256 |
36 | Texas | 4,597 | 6,533 |
37 | North Dakota | 4,611 | 169 |
38 | Iowa | 4,659 | 687 |
39 | West Virginia | 4,837 | 367 |
40 | South Dakota | 4,918 | 185 |
41 | South Carolina | 5,012 | 1,054 |
42 | Arkansas | 5,018 | 607 |
43 | Idaho | 5,171 | 375 |
44 | Wisconsin | 5,313 | 1,109 |
45 | Alabama | 5,991 | 847 |
46 | Indiana | 6,345 | 1,077 |
47 | Alaska | 6,492 | 113 |
48 | Kentucky | 7,349 | 614 |
49 | Louisiana | 9,144 | 502 |
50 | Mississippi | 9,275 | 317 |
Best and Worst Cities for Level 3 Fast Charging
While any EV charger can save an electric vehicle limping along on its last few miles of range, only Level 3 fast charging locations provide a truly useful charging experience and the functionality needed for midday errand running or road trip charging, offering a charge rate comparable to fueling a gasoline vehicle. Level 3 charging solutions (also known as DC fast charging) feature heavy duty cables and require a 480-volt high power source, allowing them to restore 80 percent of an EV’s battery level in less than 30 minutes. Compared to the 12-20 miles of range added during an hour of charging on a 240-volt, 50-amp home wallbox, charging EVs at a Level 3 charger adds 200+ miles in one hour.The national average is one Level 3 fast charger for every 11,602 residents. In terms of useful public charging options, these cities are the best and worst locations for quickly replenishing an electric vehicle.
Top 10 Most and Least EV-Friendly Metro Areas by Fast Chargers (including Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most EV-Friendly | Least EV-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers | Rank | Metro | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 2,444 | 709 | 1 | Louisville, KY | 35,648 | 44 |
2 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 3,082 | 2,123 | 2 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 32,798 | 101 |
3 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 4,161 | 929 | 3 | San Antonio, TX | 29,060 | 86 |
4 | Los Angeles, CA | 4,647 | 3,354 | 4 | Cincinnati, OH | 26,790 | 78 |
5 | San Diego, CA | 4,841 | 587 | 5 | Kansas City, MO | 26,286 | 85 |
6 | Oklahoma City, OK | 5,571 | 305 | 6 | Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA | 25,300 | 71 |
7 | Denver, CO | 5,952 | 688 | 7 | Detroit, MI | 23,130 | 184 |
8 | Las Vegas, NV | 7,225 | 283 | 8 | Milwaukee, WI | 22,381 | 86 |
9 | Washington, DC (Hagerstown, MD) | 7,454 | 827 | 9 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX | 22,033 | 329 |
10 | Portland, OR | 7,517 | 406 | 10 | Houston, TX | 21,077 | 306 |
National Avg | 11,602 | 28,727 |
Top 50 Metro Areas Ranked by Residents per Fast Charger (including Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 2,444 | 709 |
2 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 3,082 | 2,123 |
3 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 4,161 | 929 |
4 | Los Angeles, CA | 4,647 | 3,354 |
5 | San Diego, CA | 4,841 | 587 |
6 | Oklahoma City, OK | 5,571 | 305 |
7 | Denver, CO | 5,952 | 688 |
8 | Las Vegas, NV | 7,225 | 283 |
9 | Washington, DC (Hagerstown, MD) | 7,454 | 827 |
10 | Portland, OR | 7,517 | 406 |
11 | Austin, TX | 7,798 | 282 |
12 | Seattle-Tacoma, WA | 7,957 | 611 |
13 | Baltimore, MD | 7,995 | 327 |
14 | Salt Lake City, UT | 9,043 | 325 |
15 | Jacksonville, FL | 9,372 | 191 |
16 | Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL | 9,487 | 432 |
17 | West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL | 9,769 | 201 |
18 | Hartford & New Haven, CT | 9,898 | 234 |
19 | Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC | 10,147 | 286 |
20 | Phoenix, AZ | 10,303 | 489 |
21 | Boston, MA-Manchester, NH | 10,313 | 578 |
22 | Orlando-Daytona Beach, FL | 11,306 | 358 |
23 | Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM | 11,322 | 148 |
24 | Atlanta, GA | 11,595 | 546 |
25 | Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News,VA | 11,597 | 147 |
National Average | 11,602 | 28,727 | |
26 | Philadelphia, PA | 12,174 | 593 |
27 | Columbus, OH | 13,227 | 171 |
28 | New York, NY | 13,251 | 1,422 |
29 | Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC | 13,736 | 117 |
30 | Chicago, IL | 14,268 | 581 |
31 | Tampa-St Petersburg (Sarasota), FL | 16,094 | 284 |
32 | Birmingham, AL | 17,367 | 97 |
33 | Pittsburgh, PA | 17,555 | 141 |
34 | Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo, MI | 17,701 | 102 |
35 | St. Louis, MO | 18,009 | 152 |
36 | Charlotte, NC | 18,146 | 164 |
37 | Indianapolis, IN | 18,747 | 142 |
38 | Greenville-Spartanburg, SC | 18,937 | 111 |
39 | Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN | 20,778 | 203 |
40 | Nashville, TN | 21,076 | 127 |
41 | Houston, TX | 21,077 | 306 |
42 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX | 22,033 | 329 |
43 | Milwaukee, WI | 22,381 | 86 |
44 | Detroit, MI | 23,130 | 184 |
45 | Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA | 25,300 | 71 |
46 | Kansas City, MO | 26,286 | 85 |
47 | Cincinnati, OH | 26,790 | 78 |
48 | San Antonio, TX | 29,060 | 86 |
49 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 32,798 | 101 |
50 | Louisville, KY | 35,648 | 44 |
The Best and Worst States for Level 3 Fast Charging
Looking at Level 3 charging at the state level, we see (surprise!) California in the top spot, offering one Level 3 fast charger for every 4,449 residents. At the opposite end of the list is last-place Kentucky, with one Level 3 fast charger for every 40,651 residents. The full ranking of all 50 states, by Level 3 charging support, is listed in the second table.Top 10 Most and Least EV-Friendly States by Fast Chargers (including Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most EV-Friendly | Least EV-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | State | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers | Rank | State | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | California | 4,449 | 8,772 | 1 | Kentucky | 40,651 | 111 |
2 | Vermont | 5,991 | 108 | 2 | Arkansas | 38,552 | 79 |
3 | Wyoming | 6,120 | 95 | 3 | Mississippi | 34,589 | 85 |
4 | Oklahoma | 6,452 | 623 | 4 | Louisiana | 30,807 | 149 |
5 | Nevada | 7,255 | 438 | 5 | Tennessee | 26,116 | 270 |
6 | Maine | 7,612 | 182 | 6 | Ohio | 26,067 | 451 |
7 | Colorado | 7,924 | 737 | 7 | Alaska | 22,924 | 32 |
8 | Maryland | 8,646 | 713 | 8 | Wisconsin | 22,664 | 260 |
9 | Oregon | 8,689 | 488 | 9 | Idaho | 22,288 | 87 |
10 | Washington | 9,426 | 826 | 10 | Alabama | 21,231 | 239 |
National Avg | 11,602 | 28,727 |
US States Ranked by Residents per Fast Charger (including Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | State | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | California | 4,449 | 8,772 |
2 | Vermont | 5,991 | 108 |
3 | Wyoming | 6,120 | 95 |
4 | Oklahoma | 6,452 | 623 |
5 | Nevada | 7,255 | 438 |
6 | Maine | 7,612 | 182 |
7 | Colorado | 7,924 | 737 |
8 | Maryland | 8,646 | 713 |
9 | Oregon | 8,689 | 488 |
10 | Washington | 9,426 | 826 |
11 | Virginia | 9,913 | 876 |
12 | New Hampshire | 10,038 | 139 |
13 | Connecticut | 10,045 | 361 |
14 | Montana | 10,208 | 110 |
15 | Delaware | 10,392 | 98 |
16 | South Dakota | 11,517 | 79 |
National Average | 11,602 | 28,727 | |
17 | New Jersey | 11,679 | 793 |
18 | Massachusetts | 11,754 | 594 |
19 | Arizona | 12,265 | 600 |
20 | North Dakota | 12,569 | 62 |
21 | Utah | 12,758 | 265 |
22 | New Mexico | 13,126 | 161 |
23 | Georgia | 13,244 | 824 |
24 | Florida | 13,257 | 1,678 |
25 | Iowa | 13,335 | 240 |
26 | Rhode Island | 13,845 | 79 |
27 | North Carolina | 15,006 | 713 |
28 | West Virginia | 16,437 | 108 |
29 | New York | 16,647 | 1,182 |
30 | Illinois | 17,427 | 722 |
31 | Nebraska | 18,054 | 109 |
32 | Kansas | 18,243 | 161 |
33 | Pennsylvania | 18,348 | 707 |
34 | Michigan | 18,651 | 538 |
35 | Hawaii | 18,950 | 76 |
36 | South Carolina | 19,638 | 269 |
37 | Indiana | 20,397 | 335 |
38 | Minnesota | 20,419 | 280 |
39 | Texas | 20,682 | 1,452 |
40 | Missouri | 20,942 | 295 |
41 | Alabama | 21,231 | 239 |
42 | Idaho | 22,288 | 87 |
43 | Wisconsin | 22,664 | 260 |
44 | Alaska | 22,924 | 32 |
45 | Ohio | 26,067 | 451 |
46 | Tennessee | 26,116 | 270 |
47 | Louisiana | 30,807 | 149 |
48 | Mississippi | 34,589 | 85 |
49 | Arkansas | 38,552 | 79 |
50 | Kentucky | 40,651 | 111 |
Most and Least EV-Friendly Cities for Non-Tesla Drivers
So far we’ve lumped all electric vehicle chargers together, but non-Tesla EV drivers don’t have access to Tesla’s Supercharger Network, at least not yet (that is scheduled to change at the end of 2024, though our data suggests it won’t help much). Non-Tesla electric vehicle drivers need to consider which cities are the most EV friendly for them, and we’ve listed the best and worst metro areas below, along with a full top 50 ranking in the second table.Top 10 Most and Least EV-Friendly Metro Areas by Total Chargers (excluding Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most EV-Friendly | Least EV-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers | Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 545 | 12,006 | 1 | Birmingham, AL | 8,913 | 189 |
2 | San Diego, CA | 966 | 2,940 | 2 | Indianapolis, IN | 8,345 | 319 |
3 | Los Angeles, CA | 982 | 15,868 | 3 | St. Louis, MO | 8,028 | 341 |
4 | Kansas City, MO | 1,109 | 2,015 | 4 | San Antonio, TX | 7,690 | 325 |
5 | Denver, CO | 1,162 | 3,524 | 5 | Milwaukee, WI | 7,291 | 264 |
6 | Boston, MA-Manchester, NH | 1,234 | 4,831 | 6 | Louisville, KY | 7,262 | 216 |
7 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 1,367 | 2,828 | 7 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 6,692 | 495 |
8 | Baltimore, MD | 1,383 | 1,890 | 8 | Houston, TX | 6,450 | 1,000 |
9 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 1,423 | 1,218 | 9 | Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC | 5,908 | 272 |
10 | Seattle-Tacoma, WA | 1,471 | 3,304 | 10 | Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News,VA | 5,043 | 338 |
National Avg | 2,868 | 116,200 |
Top 50 Metro Areas Ranked by Residents per Charger (excluding Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 545 | 12,006 |
2 | San Diego, CA | 966 | 2,940 |
3 | Los Angeles, CA | 982 | 15,868 |
4 | Kansas City, MO | 1,109 | 2,015 |
5 | Denver, CO | 1,162 | 3,524 |
6 | Boston, MA-Manchester, NH | 1,234 | 4,831 |
7 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 1,367 | 2,828 |
8 | Baltimore, MD | 1,383 | 1,890 |
9 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 1,423 | 1,218 |
10 | Seattle-Tacoma, WA | 1,471 | 3,304 |
11 | Washington, DC (Hagerstown, MD) | 1,583 | 3,894 |
12 | Austin, TX | 1,714 | 1,283 |
13 | Salt Lake City, UT | 1,818 | 1,617 |
14 | Portland, OR | 1,840 | 1,659 |
15 | Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL | 2,297 | 1,784 |
16 | Hartford & New Haven, CT | 2,328 | 995 |
17 | Atlanta, GA | 2,375 | 2,665 |
18 | Columbus, OH | 2,388 | 947 |
19 | Las Vegas, NV | 2,546 | 803 |
20 | Phoenix, AZ | 2,788 | 1,807 |
21 | West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL | 2,842 | 691 |
National Avg | 2,868 | 116,200 | |
22 | Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC | 3,165 | 917 |
23 | Oklahoma City, OK | 3,482 | 488 |
24 | Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo, MI | 3,486 | 518 |
25 | Orlando-Daytona Beach, FL | 3,529 | 1,147 |
26 | Nashville, TN | 3,702 | 723 |
27 | Pittsburgh, PA | 3,728 | 664 |
28 | Detroit, MI | 3,730 | 1,141 |
29 | Charlotte, NC | 3,758 | 792 |
30 | New York, NY | 3,821 | 4,931 |
31 | Philadelphia, PA | 3,932 | 1,836 |
32 | Chicago, IL | 3,932 | 2,108 |
33 | Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA | 3,983 | 451 |
34 | Cincinnati, OH | 4,018 | 520 |
35 | Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM | 4,057 | 413 |
36 | Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN | 4,330 | 974 |
37 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX | 4,404 | 1,646 |
38 | Tampa-St Petersburg (Sarasota), FL | 4,562 | 1,002 |
39 | Greenville-Spartanburg, SC | 4,590 | 458 |
40 | Jacksonville, FL | 4,812 | 372 |
41 | Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News,VA | 5,043 | 338 |
42 | Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC | 5,908 | 272 |
43 | Houston, TX | 6,450 | 1,000 |
44 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 6,692 | 495 |
45 | Louisville, KY | 7,262 | 216 |
46 | Milwaukee, WI | 7,291 | 264 |
47 | San Antonio, TX | 7,690 | 325 |
48 | St. Louis, MO | 8,028 | 341 |
49 | Indianapolis, IN | 8,345 | 319 |
50 | Birmingham, AL | 8,913 | 189 |
Most and Least EV-Friendly States for Non-Tesla Drivers
Here’s the same data at the state level, showing which states offer the best EV infrastructure for non-Tesla drivers. The 10 best and worst are listed first, followed by the full ranking of all 50 states.Top 10 Most and Least EV-Friendly States by Total Chargers (excluding Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most EV-Friendly | Least EV-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers | Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | Vermont | 1,002 | 646 | 1 | Mississippi | 26,487 | 111 |
2 | California | 1,058 | 36,897 | 2 | Louisiana | 15,994 | 287 |
3 | Massachusetts | 1,279 | 5,458 | 3 | South Dakota | 13,785 | 66 |
4 | Colorado | 1,507 | 3,876 | 4 | Kentucky | 10,667 | 423 |
5 | Rhode Island | 1,581 | 692 | 5 | Indiana | 10,123 | 675 |
6 | Hawaii | 1,618 | 890 | 6 | West Virginia | 9,294 | 191 |
7 | Maryland | 1,738 | 3,547 | 7 | Alabama | 9,243 | 549 |
8 | Washington | 2,034 | 3,828 | 8 | Montana | 8,983 | 125 |
9 | Utah | 2,148 | 1,574 | 9 | Wisconsin | 7,623 | 773 |
10 | Oregon | 2,170 | 1,954 | 10 | Arkansas | 7,576 | 402 |
National Avg | 2,868 | 116,200 |
US States Ranked by Residents per Charger (excluding Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | Vermont | 1,002 | 646 |
2 | California | 1,058 | 36,897 |
3 | Massachusetts | 1,279 | 5,458 |
4 | Colorado | 1,507 | 3,876 |
5 | Rhode Island | 1,581 | 692 |
6 | Hawaii | 1,618 | 890 |
7 | Maryland | 1,738 | 3,547 |
8 | Washington | 2,034 | 3,828 |
9 | Utah | 2,148 | 1,574 |
10 | Oregon | 2,170 | 1,954 |
11 | Maine | 2,297 | 603 |
12 | New York | 2,478 | 7,940 |
13 | Connecticut | 2,724 | 1,331 |
National Average | 2,868 | 116,200 | |
14 | Nevada | 2,905 | 1,094 |
15 | Missouri | 3,199 | 1,931 |
16 | Kansas | 3,231 | 909 |
17 | Virginia | 3,446 | 2,520 |
18 | Georgia | 3,549 | 3,075 |
19 | Arizona | 3,676 | 2,002 |
20 | Delaware | 3,744 | 272 |
21 | Oklahoma | 4,073 | 987 |
22 | Florida | 4,138 | 5,376 |
23 | New Jersey | 4,254 | 2,177 |
24 | Michigan | 4,368 | 2,297 |
25 | New Hampshire | 4,443 | 314 |
26 | North Carolina | 4,555 | 2,349 |
27 | Ohio | 4,925 | 2,387 |
28 | Pennsylvania | 5,026 | 2,581 |
29 | Minnesota | 5,146 | 1,111 |
30 | Illinois | 5,176 | 2,431 |
31 | Nebraska | 5,206 | 378 |
32 | Tennessee | 5,290 | 1,333 |
33 | New Mexico | 5,461 | 387 |
34 | Wyoming | 5,873 | 99 |
35 | Iowa | 6,191 | 517 |
36 | North Dakota | 6,335 | 123 |
37 | Texas | 6,514 | 4,610 |
38 | Idaho | 6,925 | 280 |
39 | South Carolina | 7,514 | 703 |
40 | Alaska | 7,563 | 97 |
41 | Arkansas | 7,576 | 402 |
42 | Wisconsin | 7,623 | 773 |
43 | Montana | 8,983 | 125 |
44 | Alabama | 9,243 | 549 |
45 | West Virginia | 9,294 | 191 |
46 | Indiana | 10,123 | 675 |
47 | Kentucky | 10,667 | 423 |
48 | South Dakota | 13,785 | 66 |
49 | Louisiana | 15,994 | 287 |
50 | Mississippi | 26,487 | 111 |
Best and Worst Cities for Non-Tesla Drivers Seeking Level 3 Fast Charging
Non-Tesla drivers seeking a quick charge are facing the least competition in Oklahoma City, followed by four California metro areas. Louisville, Kentucky, again shows up in last place, this time for having only one non-Tesla Level 3 fast charger for every 196,063 residents. The second table shows a full list of the top 50 U.S. markets, ranked by non-Tesla Level 3 chargers.Top 10 Most and Least EV-Friendly Metro Areas by Fast Chargers (excluding Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most EV-Friendly | Least EV-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers | Rank | Metro | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | Oklahoma City, OK | 5,962 | 285 | 1 | Louisville, KY | 196,063 | 8 |
2 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 6,211 | 279 | 2 | San Antonio, TX | 138,844 | 18 |
3 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 7,903 | 828 | 3 | Milwaukee, WI | 87,491 | 22 |
4 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 8,867 | 436 | 4 | Kansas City, MO | 82,752 | 27 |
5 | Los Angeles, CA | 10,469 | 1,489 | 5 | Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA | 78,100 | 23 |
6 | Denver, CO | 10,919 | 375 | 6 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX | 72,488 | 100 |
7 | San Diego, CA | 11,457 | 248 | 7 | Greenville-Spartanburg, SC | 67,806 | 31 |
8 | Portland, OR | 13,328 | 229 | 8 | Indianapolis, IN | 66,553 | 40 |
9 | Baltimore, MD | 13,616 | 192 | 9 | Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN | 64,891 | 65 |
10 | Seattle-Tacoma, WA | 13,930 | 349 | 10 | Houston, TX | 64,496 | 100 |
National Avg | 29,035 | 11,479 |
Top 50 Metro Areas Ranked by Residents per Fast Charger (excluding Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | Oklahoma City, OK | 5,962 | 285 |
2 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 6,211 | 279 |
3 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 7,903 | 828 |
4 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 8,867 | 436 |
5 | Los Angeles, CA | 10,469 | 1,489 |
6 | Denver, CO | 10,919 | 375 |
7 | San Diego, CA | 11,457 | 248 |
8 | Portland, OR | 13,328 | 229 |
9 | Baltimore, MD | 13,616 | 192 |
10 | Seattle-Tacoma, WA | 13,930 | 349 |
11 | Washington, DC (Hagerstown, MD) | 15,606 | 395 |
12 | Salt Lake City, UT | 19,994 | 147 |
13 | Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News,VA | 20,055 | 85 |
14 | Las Vegas, NV | 20,653 | 99 |
15 | Columbus, OH | 20,751 | 109 |
16 | Atlanta, GA | 20,756 | 305 |
17 | Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM | 23,939 | 70 |
18 | West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL | 24,242 | 81 |
19 | Jacksonville, FL | 25,943 | 69 |
National Avg | 29,035 | 11,479 | |
20 | Boston, MA-Manchester, NH | 30,105 | 198 |
21 | St. Louis, MO | 32,205 | 85 |
22 | Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC | 32,243 | 90 |
23 | Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL | 34,153 | 120 |
24 | Phoenix, AZ | 35,233 | 143 |
25 | Hartford & New Haven, CT | 36,189 | 64 |
26 | Philadelphia, PA | 36,277 | 199 |
27 | Pittsburgh, PA | 36,943 | 67 |
28 | Nashville, TN | 38,793 | 69 |
29 | Detroit, MI | 40,150 | 106 |
30 | New York, NY | 40,785 | 462 |
31 | Orlando-Daytona Beach, FL | 41,302 | 98 |
32 | Austin, TX | 42,287 | 52 |
33 | Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo, MI | 42,988 | 42 |
34 | Chicago, IL | 44,330 | 187 |
35 | Birmingham, AL | 45,530 | 37 |
36 | Charlotte, NC | 45,785 | 65 |
37 | Cincinnati, OH | 47,491 | 44 |
38 | Tampa-St Petersburg (Sarasota), FL | 59,361 | 77 |
39 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 61,344 | 54 |
40 | Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC | 64,284 | 25 |
41 | Houston, TX | 64,496 | 100 |
42 | Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN | 64,891 | 65 |
43 | Indianapolis, IN | 66,553 | 40 |
44 | Greenville-Spartanburg, SC | 67,806 | 31 |
45 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX | 72,488 | 100 |
46 | Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA | 78,100 | 23 |
47 | Kansas City, MO | 82,752 | 27 |
48 | Milwaukee, WI | 87,491 | 22 |
49 | San Antonio, TX | 138,844 | 18 |
50 | Louisville, KY | 196,063 | 8 |
Best and Worst States for Level 3 Charging for Non-Tesla Drivers
At the state level, non-Tesla drivers have the lowest per-capita competition for fast charging in Oklahoma, at 6,848 residents per non-Tesla Level 3 charger. Mississippi is the worst state for non-Tesla Level 3 charging infrastructure, with one fast charger for every 226,158 residents. All 50 states are ranked in the second table.Top 10 Most and Least EV-Friendly States by Fast Chargers (excluding Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most EV-Friendly | Least EV-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | State | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers | Rank | State | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | Oklahoma | 6,848 | 587 | 1 | Mississippi | 226,158 | 13 |
2 | California | 10,696 | 3,649 | 2 | Kentucky | 180,492 | 25 |
3 | Vermont | 11,983 | 54 | 3 | West Virginia | 177,516 | 10 |
4 | Colorado | 13,872 | 421 | 4 | Louisiana | 139,098 | 33 |
5 | Oregon | 16,246 | 261 | 5 | Arkansas | 95,176 | 32 |
6 | Maryland | 16,661 | 370 | 6 | Indiana | 93,603 | 73 |
7 | Washington | 17,898 | 435 | 7 | Texas | 87,806 | 342 |
8 | Hawaii | 20,574 | 70 | 8 | South Carolina | 86,601 | 61 |
9 | Virginia | 21,180 | 410 | 9 | Wisconsin | 85,399 | 69 |
10 | Nevada | 21,185 | 150 | 10 | Alabama | 67,657 | 75 |
National Avg | 29,035 | 11,479 |
US States Ranked by Residents per Fast Charger (excluding Tesla Network) as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | State | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | Oklahoma | 6,848 | 587 |
2 | California | 10,696 | 3,649 |
3 | Vermont | 11,983 | 54 |
4 | Colorado | 13,872 | 421 |
5 | Oregon | 16,246 | 261 |
6 | Maryland | 16,661 | 370 |
7 | Washington | 17,898 | 435 |
8 | Hawaii | 20,574 | 70 |
9 | Virginia | 21,180 | 410 |
10 | Nevada | 21,185 | 150 |
11 | Maine | 22,344 | 62 |
12 | Rhode Island | 23,271 | 47 |
13 | Wyoming | 25,277 | 23 |
14 | Utah | 27,486 | 123 |
15 | Iowa | 28,075 | 114 |
16 | Georgia | 28,493 | 383 |
National Average | 29,035 | 11,479 | |
17 | New Mexico | 30,628 | 69 |
18 | Connecticut | 34,535 | 105 |
19 | North Dakota | 35,421 | 22 |
20 | Massachusetts | 35,990 | 194 |
21 | Alaska | 36,679 | 20 |
22 | Nebraska | 37,131 | 53 |
23 | New Jersey | 37,196 | 249 |
24 | New Hampshire | 37,709 | 37 |
25 | Michigan | 40,460 | 248 |
26 | Arizona | 42,294 | 174 |
27 | New York | 42,776 | 460 |
28 | Montana | 43,187 | 26 |
29 | Florida | 45,030 | 494 |
30 | Ohio | 46,284 | 254 |
31 | Delaware | 46,291 | 22 |
32 | Idaho | 47,293 | 41 |
33 | South Dakota | 47,885 | 19 |
34 | Illinois | 49,149 | 256 |
35 | Missouri | 50,639 | 122 |
36 | North Carolina | 51,937 | 206 |
37 | Minnesota | 57,172 | 100 |
38 | Pennsylvania | 57,653 | 225 |
39 | Kansas | 59,942 | 49 |
40 | Tennessee | 64,103 | 110 |
41 | Alabama | 67,657 | 75 |
42 | Wisconsin | 85,399 | 69 |
43 | South Carolina | 86,601 | 61 |
44 | Texas | 87,806 | 342 |
45 | Indiana | 93,603 | 73 |
46 | Arkansas | 95,176 | 32 |
47 | Louisiana | 139,098 | 33 |
48 | West Virginia | 177,516 | 10 |
49 | Kentucky | 180,492 | 25 |
50 | Mississippi | 226,158 | 13 |
Best and Worst Cities and States for Tesla Drivers
The next few tables show the most EV-friendly cities and states for Tesla drivers.Top 10 Most and Least Tesla-Friendly Metro Areas by Total Chargers in Tesla Network as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most Tesla-Friendly | Least Tesla-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers | Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 3,151 | 2,077 | 1 | Detroit, MI | 35,764 | 119 |
2 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 3,656 | 474 | 2 | Oklahoma City, OK | 34,678 | 49 |
3 | Austin, TX | 5,553 | 396 | 3 | Kansas City, MO | 25,980 | 86 |
4 | San Diego, CA | 5,571 | 510 | 4 | Cincinnati, OH | 25,176 | 83 |
5 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 5,920 | 653 | 5 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 23,661 | 140 |
6 | Jacksonville, FL | 5,967 | 300 | 6 | Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA | 21,133 | 85 |
7 | Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL | 6,404 | 640 | 7 | St. Louis, MO | 20,738 | 132 |
8 | Los Angeles, CA | 6,444 | 2,419 | 8 | Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo, MI | 19,841 | 91 |
9 | Denver, CO | 6,779 | 604 | 9 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX | 19,177 | 378 |
10 | Las Vegas, NV | 6,954 | 294 | 10 | Louisville, KY | 18,238 | 86 |
National Avg | 11,124 | 29,960 |
Top 50 Metro Areas Ranked by Residents per Charger in Tesla Network as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 3,151 | 2,077 |
2 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 3,656 | 474 |
3 | Austin, TX | 5,553 | 396 |
4 | San Diego, CA | 5,571 | 510 |
5 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 5,920 | 653 |
6 | Jacksonville, FL | 5,967 | 300 |
7 | Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL | 6,404 | 640 |
8 | Los Angeles, CA | 6,444 | 2,419 |
9 | Denver, CO | 6,779 | 604 |
10 | Las Vegas, NV | 6,954 | 294 |
11 | West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL | 7,114 | 276 |
12 | Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News,VA | 7,610 | 224 |
13 | Portland, OR | 7,948 | 384 |
14 | New York, NY | 8,143 | 2,314 |
15 | Salt Lake City, UT | 8,350 | 352 |
16 | Washington, DC (Hagerstown, MD) | 8,609 | 716 |
17 | Phoenix, AZ | 8,902 | 566 |
18 | Hartford & New Haven, CT | 8,977 | 258 |
19 | Orlando-Daytona Beach, FL | 9,220 | 439 |
20 | Atlanta, GA | 10,859 | 583 |
21 | Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC | 10,909 | 266 |
22 | Seattle-Tacoma, WA | 11,049 | 440 |
National Avg | 11,124 | 29,960 | |
23 | Boston, MA-Manchester, NH | 11,141 | 535 |
24 | Baltimore, MD | 11,416 | 229 |
25 | Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN | 12,743 | 331 |
26 | Tampa-St Petersburg (Sarasota), FL | 13,059 | 350 |
27 | Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM | 13,091 | 128 |
28 | Chicago, IL | 13,242 | 626 |
29 | Greenville-Spartanburg, SC | 13,561 | 155 |
30 | Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC | 13,975 | 115 |
31 | Philadelphia, PA | 14,018 | 515 |
32 | Houston, TX | 14,396 | 448 |
33 | Charlotte, NC | 14,880 | 200 |
34 | Nashville, TN | 15,295 | 175 |
35 | Indianapolis, IN | 15,477 | 172 |
36 | Birmingham, AL | 15,744 | 107 |
37 | Columbus, OH | 16,273 | 139 |
38 | Milwaukee, WI | 16,884 | 114 |
39 | Pittsburgh, PA | 17,189 | 144 |
40 | San Antonio, TX | 17,980 | 139 |
41 | Louisville, KY | 18,238 | 86 |
42 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX | 19,177 | 378 |
43 | Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo, MI | 19,841 | 91 |
44 | St. Louis, MO | 20,738 | 132 |
45 | Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA | 21,133 | 85 |
46 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 23,661 | 140 |
47 | Cincinnati, OH | 25,176 | 83 |
48 | Kansas City, MO | 25,980 | 86 |
49 | Oklahoma City, OK | 34,678 | 49 |
50 | Detroit, MI | 35,764 | 119 |
Top 10 Most and Least Tesla-Friendly States by Total Chargers in Tesla Network as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most Tesla-Friendly | Least Tesla-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers | Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | Vermont | 2,362 | 274 | 1 | Hawaii | 57,608 | 25 |
2 | California | 5,281 | 7,390 | 2 | Alaska | 45,849 | 16 |
3 | Maine | 5,288 | 262 | 3 | Oklahoma | 44,174 | 91 |
4 | Wyoming | 5,383 | 108 | 4 | Ohio | 26,902 | 437 |
5 | Nevada | 6,194 | 513 | 5 | Nebraska | 26,594 | 74 |
6 | South Dakota | 7,646 | 119 | 6 | Michigan | 24,355 | 412 |
7 | Oregon | 8,233 | 515 | 7 | Kentucky | 23,625 | 191 |
8 | Montana | 8,572 | 131 | 8 | Louisiana | 21,350 | 215 |
9 | New Hampshire | 8,775 | 159 | 9 | Idaho | 20,411 | 95 |
10 | Colorado | 8,930 | 654 | 10 | Tennessee | 19,752 | 357 |
National Avg | 11,124 | 29,960 |
Top 50 States Ranked by Residents per Charger in Tesla Network as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Total Chargers |
1 | Vermont | 2,362 | 274 |
2 | California | 5,281 | 7390 |
3 | Maine | 5,288 | 262 |
4 | Wyoming | 5,383 | 108 |
5 | Nevada | 6,194 | 513 |
6 | South Dakota | 7,646 | 119 |
7 | Oregon | 8,233 | 515 |
8 | Montana | 8,572 | 131 |
9 | New Hampshire | 8,775 | 159 |
10 | Colorado | 8,930 | 654 |
11 | New York | 9,156 | 2149 |
12 | Virginia | 9,317 | 932 |
13 | Connecticut | 9,619 | 377 |
14 | Florida | 9,821 | 2265 |
15 | West Virginia | 10,086 | 176 |
16 | Georgia | 10,544 | 1035 |
17 | Arizona | 10,919 | 674 |
National Average | 11,124 | 29,960 | |
18 | Utah | 11,195 | 302 |
19 | Delaware | 11,443 | 89 |
20 | Washington | 11,586 | 672 |
21 | Maryland | 12,404 | 497 |
22 | Massachusetts | 13,350 | 523 |
23 | North Carolina | 13,374 | 800 |
24 | New Jersey | 13,384 | 692 |
25 | Minnesota | 14,047 | 407 |
26 | Mississippi | 14,272 | 206 |
27 | Arkansas | 14,857 | 205 |
28 | New Mexico | 14,883 | 142 |
29 | South Carolina | 15,050 | 351 |
30 | Texas | 15,616 | 1923 |
31 | Illinois | 16,469 | 764 |
32 | North Dakota | 16,940 | 46 |
33 | Indiana | 16,998 | 402 |
34 | Alabama | 17,028 | 298 |
35 | Pennsylvania | 17,250 | 752 |
36 | Wisconsin | 17,537 | 336 |
37 | Missouri | 18,012 | 343 |
38 | Kansas | 18,708 | 157 |
39 | Iowa | 18,827 | 170 |
40 | Rhode Island | 19,531 | 56 |
41 | Tennessee | 19,752 | 357 |
42 | Idaho | 20,411 | 95 |
43 | Louisiana | 21,350 | 215 |
44 | Kentucky | 23,625 | 191 |
45 | Michigan | 24,355 | 412 |
46 | Nebraska | 26,594 | 74 |
47 | Ohio | 26,902 | 437 |
48 | Oklahoma | 44,174 | 91 |
49 | Alaska | 45,849 | 16 |
50 | Hawaii | 57,608 | 25 |
Top 10 Most and Least Tesla-Friendly Metro Areas by Fast Chargers in Tesla Network as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most Tesla-Friendly | Least Tesla-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Fast Chargers | Rank | Metro | Residents per Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 4,030 | 474 | 1 | Oklahoma City, OK | 84,960 | 20 |
2 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 5,053 | 2,077 | 2 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 70,481 | 47 |
3 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 7,842 | 653 | 3 | Cincinnati, OH | 61,459 | 34 |
4 | Los Angeles, CA | 8,358 | 2,419 | 4 | Detroit, MI | 54,563 | 78 |
5 | San Diego, CA | 8,382 | 510 | 5 | Nashville, TN | 46,150 | 58 |
6 | Austin, TX | 9,560 | 396 | 6 | Louisville, KY | 43,569 | 36 |
7 | Las Vegas, NV | 11,112 | 294 | 7 | St. Louis, MO | 40,857 | 67 |
8 | Denver, CO | 13,082 | 604 | 8 | Kansas City, MO | 38,522 | 58 |
9 | Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL | 13,136 | 640 | 9 | Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA | 37,423 | 48 |
10 | Hartford & New Haven, CT | 13,624 | 258 | 10 | San Antonio, TX | 36,753 | 68 |
National Avg | 19,323 | 17,248 |
Top 50 Metro Areas Ranked by Residents per Fast Charger in Tesla Network as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | Metro | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | Fresno-Visalia, CA | 4,030 | 474 |
2 | San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA | 5,053 | 2,077 |
3 | Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA | 7,842 | 653 |
4 | Los Angeles, CA | 8,358 | 2,419 |
5 | San Diego, CA | 8,382 | 510 |
6 | Austin, TX | 9,560 | 396 |
7 | Las Vegas, NV | 11,112 | 294 |
8 | Denver, CO | 13,082 | 604 |
9 | Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL | 13,136 | 640 |
10 | Hartford & New Haven, CT | 13,624 | 258 |
11 | Washington, DC (Hagerstown, MD) | 14,269 | 716 |
12 | Phoenix, AZ | 14,562 | 566 |
13 | Jacksonville, FL | 14,673 | 300 |
14 | Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC | 14,806 | 266 |
15 | Orlando-Daytona Beach, FL | 15,568 | 439 |
16 | Boston, MA-Manchester, NH | 15,686 | 535 |
17 | West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL | 16,363 | 276 |
18 | Salt Lake City, UT | 16,512 | 352 |
19 | Portland, OR | 17,243 | 384 |
20 | Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC | 17,468 | 115 |
21 | Philadelphia, PA | 18,323 | 515 |
22 | Seattle-Tacoma, WA | 18,556 | 440 |
National Avg | 19,323 | 17,248 | |
23 | Baltimore, MD | 19,365 | 229 |
24 | New York, NY | 19,628 | 2,314 |
25 | Chicago, IL | 21,040 | 626 |
26 | Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM | 21,483 | 128 |
27 | Tampa-St Petersburg (Sarasota), FL | 22,081 | 350 |
28 | Indianapolis, IN | 26,099 | 172 |
29 | Atlanta, GA | 26,268 | 583 |
30 | Greenville-Spartanburg, SC | 26,275 | 155 |
31 | Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News,VA | 27,495 | 224 |
32 | Birmingham, AL | 28,077 | 107 |
33 | Charlotte, NC | 30,061 | 200 |
34 | Milwaukee, WI | 30,075 | 114 |
35 | Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo, MI | 30,092 | 91 |
36 | Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN | 30,564 | 331 |
37 | Houston, TX | 31,309 | 448 |
38 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX | 31,654 | 378 |
39 | Pittsburgh, PA | 33,449 | 144 |
40 | Columbus, OH | 36,482 | 139 |
41 | San Antonio, TX | 36,753 | 139 |
42 | Harrisburg-Lancaster-York, PA | 37,423 | 85 |
43 | Kansas City, MO | 38,522 | 86 |
44 | St. Louis, MO | 40,857 | 132 |
45 | Louisville, KY | 43,569 | 86 |
46 | Nashville, TN | 46,150 | 175 |
47 | Detroit, MI | 54,563 | 119 |
48 | Cincinnati, OH | 61,459 | 83 |
49 | Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH | 70,481 | 140 |
50 | Oklahoma City, OK | 84,960 | 49 |
Top 10 Most and Least Tesla-Friendly States by Fast Chargers in Tesla Network as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||||||
Most Tesla-Friendly | Least Tesla-Friendly | ||||||
Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Fast Chargers | Rank | State | Residents per Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | California | 7,618 | 5,123 | 1 | Hawaii | 240,033 | 6 |
2 | Wyoming | 8,075 | 72 | 2 | Oklahoma | 111,661 | 36 |
3 | Nevada | 11,034 | 288 | 3 | Arkansas | 64,801 | 47 |
4 | Maine | 11,545 | 120 | 4 | Alaska | 61,132 | 12 |
5 | Vermont | 11,983 | 54 | 5 | Ohio | 59,675 | 197 |
6 | Montana | 13,367 | 84 | 6 | Kentucky | 52,469 | 86 |
7 | Delaware | 13,400 | 76 | 7 | Tennessee | 44,071 | 160 |
8 | New Hampshire | 13,679 | 102 | 8 | Idaho | 42,153 | 46 |
9 | Connecticut | 14,165 | 256 | 9 | Mississippi | 40,834 | 72 |
10 | South Dakota | 15,164 | 60 | 10 | Louisiana | 39,571 | 116 |
National Avg | 19,323 | 17,248 |
US States Ranked by Residents per Fast Charger in Tesla Network as of 2022 - iSeeCars Study | |||
Rank | State | Residents per Fast Charger | Fast Chargers |
1 | California | 7,618 | 5123 |
2 | Wyoming | 8,075 | 72 |
3 | Nevada | 11,034 | 288 |
4 | Maine | 11,545 | 120 |
5 | Vermont | 11,983 | 54 |
6 | Montana | 13,367 | 84 |
7 | Delaware | 13,400 | 76 |
8 | New Hampshire | 13,679 | 102 |
9 | Connecticut | 14,165 | 256 |
10 | South Dakota | 15,164 | 60 |
11 | New Jersey | 17,025 | 544 |
12 | Arizona | 17,275 | 426 |
13 | Massachusetts | 17,455 | 400 |
14 | Maryland | 17,973 | 343 |
15 | West Virginia | 18,114 | 98 |
16 | Colorado | 18,481 | 316 |
17 | Virginia | 18,634 | 466 |
18 | Oregon | 18,679 | 227 |
19 | Florida | 18,788 | 1184 |
National Average | 19,323 | 17,248 | |
20 | North Dakota | 19,482 | 40 |
21 | Washington | 19,912 | 391 |
22 | North Carolina | 21,103 | 507 |
23 | New Mexico | 22,971 | 92 |
24 | Utah | 23,808 | 142 |
25 | Georgia | 24,746 | 441 |
26 | South Carolina | 25,397 | 208 |
27 | Iowa | 25,401 | 126 |
28 | Indiana | 26,080 | 262 |
29 | Kansas | 26,225 | 112 |
30 | Pennsylvania | 26,913 | 482 |
31 | Illinois | 27,000 | 466 |
32 | Texas | 27,054 | 1110 |
33 | New York | 27,254 | 722 |
34 | Wisconsin | 30,851 | 191 |
35 | Alabama | 30,941 | 164 |
36 | Minnesota | 31,762 | 180 |
37 | Rhode Island | 34,179 | 32 |
38 | Michigan | 34,600 | 290 |
39 | Nebraska | 35,141 | 56 |
40 | Missouri | 35,711 | 173 |
41 | Louisiana | 39,571 | 116 |
42 | Mississippi | 40,834 | 72 |
43 | Idaho | 42,153 | 46 |
44 | Tennessee | 44,071 | 160 |
45 | Kentucky | 52,469 | 86 |
46 | Ohio | 59,675 | 197 |
47 | Alaska | 61,132 | 12 |
48 | Arkansas | 64,801 | 47 |
49 | Oklahoma | 111,661 | 36 |
50 | Hawaii | 240,033 | 6 |
What Does the Future Hold for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations?
The shift from gasoline-powered cars to zero-emission electric vehicles is underway, with new government incentives aiming to get to 50 percent EV market share by 2030. That figure may or may not be realistic, but EV market share will continue to grow, and that means more pressure on the existing EV infrastructure. With more than $5 billion in new government incentives aimed at improving the EV infrastructure, we can expect more charging options for all those new electric vehicle owners.There are approximately 30,000 Level 3 fast charging stations in the U.S. right now. That compares to 150,000 gas stations. To achieve a 5 times increase in fast charging access will require installing EV chargers in more than just airport and mall parking lots. Car dealerships, neighborhood parks, and every multifamily housing unit will need to pitch in. In an ideal world, these 120,000 new EV stations will run off some form of renewable energy, providing a truly substantial reduction in CO2 emissions and long-term sustainability.
All these new EV charging stations will also need to be managed and maintained, whether by their original manufacturers or by companies that specialize in EV chargers. Finally, the user experience for EV drivers, who need real time status updates on public chargers, will depend on effective social media and mobile apps support, as seen in the current PlugShare community.
“We’re living in the most disruptive era in the 140-year history of the automobile,” said Karl Brauer. “Nobody knows exactly what the next 10 years will look like in terms of electrification, but everyone can agree on this point – it won’t be boring.”
Methodology
iSeeCars analyzed data from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Alternative Fuels Data Center through 2022 as of February 8, 2023. The number of Level 2 EVSE and DC Fast EVSE ports was aggregated nationally, by metro area, and by state. The data was also aggregated for chargers from Tesla’s network vs. all other networks. The number of chargers was normalized by population counts from the U.S. Census Bureau and expressed as the number of residents per charger.
About iSeeCars.com:
iSeeCars.com is a data-driven car search and research company that helps shoppers find the best car deals by providing key insights and valuable resources, like the iSeeCars VIN check report and Best Cars rankings. iSeeCars.com has saved users over $372 million so far by applying big data analytics powered by over 25 billion (and growing) data points and using proprietary algorithms to objectively analyze, score and rank millions of new cars and used cars.